User journeys
Browser-run paths through launch-critical customer actions.
Website and SaaS launch audit
Audit the deployed experience across eight launch areas before real customers find the blockers.
Launch verdict is blocked
Audit coverage
One confirmed scope combines browser execution with clearly labelled evidence sources. It is not a source-code audit or penetration test.
Browser-run paths through launch-critical customer actions.
Interaction friction, hierarchy, messaging, and conversion clarity.
Automatable barriers plus keyboard, focus, label, and contrast signals.
Representative browser performance and page stability signals.
Observable measurement gaps, failed requests, and runtime errors.
Metadata, canonicals, robots, sitemap, and crawlability signals.
HTTPS, mixed content, selected headers, and browser-visible trust paths.
Important pages and journeys across desktop, tablet, and mobile.
Evidence first
Findings connect an observation to its location, viewport, source, confidence, and reproduction steps.
The captured state and measured signal stay distinct from any AI-assisted interpretation.
Methods stay separate
Every finding identifies how it was produced so teams can evaluate the evidence without confusing methods.
Reproducible browser, markup, network, and runtime observations for applicable checks.
Clearly labelled interpretation of captured UX, messaging, and journey evidence.
Optional and operationally separate. It is never implied to be part of the automated audit.
UX testing scenarios
The same launch can expose different risks to a first-time visitor, returning buyer, mobile visitor, or keyboard-only user.
Website launch readiness
Critical blockers determine the launch gate. Lower-priority findings and the numerical score remain supporting context.
Who it is for
The report gives planning roles and validation roles one shared, evidence-backed set of launch priorities.
Building the release
Validating the release
Technical signals
Applicable checks expose concrete browser-visible signals instead of hiding the audit scope behind one score.
Scope comparison
AuditMyLaunch combines launch-focused product checks with technical website signals. It is not a source-code audit or penetration test.
| Check type | AuditMyLaunch | SEO-only audit | Lighthouse-only check |
|---|---|---|---|
| UX and key user flows | Included | Usually not | Not covered |
| Accessibility signals | Included | Varies | Automated subset |
| Performance signals | Included where applicable | Varies | Included |
| SEO and crawlability | Included | Primary focus | Basic checks |
| Analytics and conversion events | Included | Varies | Not covered |
| Source code or penetration testing | Not included | Not included | Not included |
Common questions
AuditMyLaunch checks the confirmed deployed-site scope across user journeys, UX and conversion, accessibility, performance, analytics and errors, SEO and discoverability, security basics, and responsive behavior.
No. The website audit runs against the deployed website and does not request repository or source-code access.
Authenticated coverage can be selected when a suitable dedicated, non-production test account is provided after checkout. Skipped coverage stays visible as a limitation.
Free scope mapping identifies public pages and likely customer journeys. A paid audit begins only after you review and confirm its scope.
Start with scope
Free mapping identifies possible pages and customer journeys. The paid audit does not start at this step.